On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 05:52:16PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 23:49 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:56:30AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:40:17PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:17 -070
On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 23:49 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:56:30AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:40:17PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:17 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > :
> > > > @@ -734,6 +742,7 @@ voi
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> ---
>> It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and CONFIG_X86_PAT
>> and end up with a system with MTRR functionality disabled
>> PAT functionality enabled.
>
> This is missing a conj
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> ---
> It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and CONFIG_X86_PAT
> and end up with a system with MTRR functionality disabled
> PAT functionality enabled.
This is missing a conjunction or something in "MTRR functionality
disabled PAT functio
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:56:30AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:40:17PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:17 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > :
> > > @@ -734,6 +742,7 @@ void __init mtrr_bp_init(void)
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (mtrr_if) {
>
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 03:28:51PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'll rephrase this to:
> >> >
> >> >
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> > I'll rephrase this to:
>> >
>> > ---
>> > It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
>> > disabled at r
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > I'll rephrase this to:
> >
> > ---
> > It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
> > disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
> > to kick through with al
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> I'll rephrase this to:
>
> ---
> It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
> disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
> to kick through with all functionally enabled. This
> can happen for instance on Xen where MTR
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:40:17PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:17 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> :
> > @@ -734,6 +742,7 @@ void __init mtrr_bp_init(void)
> > }
> >
> > if (mtrr_if) {
> > + mtrr_enabled = true;
> > set_num_var_ranges();
> >
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:17 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
:
> @@ -734,6 +742,7 @@ void __init mtrr_bp_init(void)
> }
>
> if (mtrr_if) {
> + mtrr_enabled = true;
> set_num_var_ranges();
> init_table();
> if (use_intel()) {
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 03:59:41PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:17:52PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
> >
> > It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
> > disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
> > to ki
On 03/25/2015 08:59 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:17:52PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
to kick through fully functionally. This c
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:17:52PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
>
> It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
> disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
> to kick through fully functionally. This can happen
s/fully/full/ ?
> for instance on
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
to kick through fully functionally. This can happen
for instance on Xen where MTRR is not supported but
PAT is, this can happen now on Linux as of commit
47591df50 b
15 matches
Mail list logo