On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 05:52:16PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 23:49 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:56:30AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:40:17PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:17
On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 23:49 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:56:30AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:40:17PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:17 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > :
> > > > @@ -734,6 +742,7 @@
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> ---
>> It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and CONFIG_X86_PAT
>> and end up with a system with MTRR functionality disabled
>> PAT functionality enabled.
>
> This is missing a
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> ---
> It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and CONFIG_X86_PAT
> and end up with a system with MTRR functionality disabled
> PAT functionality enabled.
This is missing a conjunction or something in "MTRR functionality
disabled PAT
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:56:30AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:40:17PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:17 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > :
> > > @@ -734,6 +742,7 @@ void __init mtrr_bp_init(void)
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (mtrr_if) {
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 03:28:51PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'll rephrase this to:
> >> >
> >> >
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> > I'll rephrase this to:
>> >
>> > ---
>> > It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
>> > disabled at
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > I'll rephrase this to:
> >
> > ---
> > It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
> > disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
> > to kick through with
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> I'll rephrase this to:
>
> ---
> It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
> disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
> to kick through with all functionally enabled. This
> can happen for instance on Xen where
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
I'll rephrase this to:
---
It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
I'll rephrase this to:
---
It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
to
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
---
It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and CONFIG_X86_PAT
and end up with a system with MTRR functionality disabled
PAT functionality enabled.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
I'll rephrase this to:
---
It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
to kick through with all functionally enabled. This
can happen for instance on Xen
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:56:30AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:40:17PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:17 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
:
@@ -734,6 +742,7 @@ void __init mtrr_bp_init(void)
}
if (mtrr_if) {
+
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 03:28:51PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
---
It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and CONFIG_X86_PAT
and end up with a system with MTRR functionality disabled
PAT functionality enabled.
This is missing a conjunction or something in MTRR functionality
disabled
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 05:52:16PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 23:49 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:56:30AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:40:17PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:17 -0700, Luis
On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 23:49 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:56:30AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:40:17PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:17 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
:
@@ -734,6 +742,7 @@ void __init
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:40:17PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:17 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> :
> > @@ -734,6 +742,7 @@ void __init mtrr_bp_init(void)
> > }
> >
> > if (mtrr_if) {
> > + mtrr_enabled = true;
> > set_num_var_ranges();
>
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:17 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
:
> @@ -734,6 +742,7 @@ void __init mtrr_bp_init(void)
> }
>
> if (mtrr_if) {
> + mtrr_enabled = true;
> set_num_var_ranges();
> init_table();
> if (use_intel()) {
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:17 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
:
@@ -734,6 +742,7 @@ void __init mtrr_bp_init(void)
}
if (mtrr_if) {
+ mtrr_enabled = true;
set_num_var_ranges();
init_table();
if (use_intel()) {
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:40:17PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:17 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
:
@@ -734,6 +742,7 @@ void __init mtrr_bp_init(void)
}
if (mtrr_if) {
+ mtrr_enabled = true;
set_num_var_ranges();
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 03:59:41PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:17:52PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
> >
> > It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
> > disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
> > to
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 03:59:41PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:17:52PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com
It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
to
On 03/25/2015 08:59 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:17:52PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
to kick through fully functionally. This
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:17:52PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
>
> It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
> disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
> to kick through fully functionally. This can happen
s/fully/full/ ?
> for instance
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:17:52PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com
It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
to kick through fully functionally. This can happen
s/fully/full/ ?
for
On 03/25/2015 08:59 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:17:52PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com
It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
to kick through fully
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
to kick through fully functionally. This can happen
for instance on Xen where MTRR is not supported but
PAT is, this can happen now on Linux as of commit
47591df50
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com
It is possible to enable CONFIG_MTRR and up with it
disabled at run time and yet CONFIG_X86_PAT continues
to kick through fully functionally. This can happen
for instance on Xen where MTRR is not supported but
PAT is, this can happen now on Linux as of
30 matches
Mail list logo