Re: [PATCH v1 09/11] cpufreq: tegra20: Allow cpufreq driver to be built as loadable module

2018-05-18 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 09:00:54PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > Nothing prevents Tegra20 CPUFreq module to be unloaded, hence allow it to > be built as a non-builtin kernel module. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko > --- > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),

Re: [PATCH v1 09/11] cpufreq: tegra20: Allow cpufreq driver to be built as loadable module

2018-05-17 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 17-05-18, 21:00, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > Nothing prevents Tegra20 CPUFreq module to be unloaded, hence allow it to > be built as a non-builtin kernel module. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko > --- > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > di

[PATCH v1 09/11] cpufreq: tegra20: Allow cpufreq driver to be built as loadable module

2018-05-17 Thread Dmitry Osipenko
Nothing prevents Tegra20 CPUFreq module to be unloaded, hence allow it to be built as a non-builtin kernel module. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko --- drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kcon