Re: [PATCH v1 09/12] serial: 8250_lpss: split LPSS driver to separate module

2016-04-11 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 15:44 -0700, Peter Hurley wrote: > On 04/08/2016 01:17 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Peter Hurley > om> wrote: > > > > > > On 04/07/2016 01:37 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > > Intes SoCs, such as

Re: [PATCH v1 09/12] serial: 8250_lpss: split LPSS driver to separate module

2016-04-11 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 15:44 -0700, Peter Hurley wrote: > On 04/08/2016 01:17 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Peter Hurley > om> wrote: > > > > > > On 04/07/2016 01:37 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > > Intes SoCs, such as Braswell, have DesignWare

Re: [PATCH v1 09/12] serial: 8250_lpss: split LPSS driver to separate module

2016-04-08 Thread Peter Hurley
On 04/08/2016 01:17 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Peter Hurley wrote: >> On 04/07/2016 01:37 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> Intes SoCs, such as Braswell, have DesignWare UART. Split out to separate >>> module which also will be used for

Re: [PATCH v1 09/12] serial: 8250_lpss: split LPSS driver to separate module

2016-04-08 Thread Peter Hurley
On 04/08/2016 01:17 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Peter Hurley wrote: >> On 04/07/2016 01:37 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> Intes SoCs, such as Braswell, have DesignWare UART. Split out to separate >>> module which also will be used for Intel Quark later. >> >>

Re: [PATCH v1 09/12] serial: 8250_lpss: split LPSS driver to separate module

2016-04-08 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Peter Hurley wrote: > On 04/07/2016 01:37 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> Intes SoCs, such as Braswell, have DesignWare UART. Split out to separate >> module which also will be used for Intel Quark later. > > What's the rationale? 1. Not

Re: [PATCH v1 09/12] serial: 8250_lpss: split LPSS driver to separate module

2016-04-08 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Peter Hurley wrote: > On 04/07/2016 01:37 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> Intes SoCs, such as Braswell, have DesignWare UART. Split out to separate >> module which also will be used for Intel Quark later. > > What's the rationale? 1. Not poison 8250_pci with too

Re: [PATCH v1 09/12] serial: 8250_lpss: split LPSS driver to separate module

2016-04-07 Thread Peter Hurley
On 04/07/2016 01:37 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Intes SoCs, such as Braswell, have DesignWare UART. Split out to separate > module which also will be used for Intel Quark later. What's the rationale? And this really isn't a split; this patch introduces a number of significant changes from the

Re: [PATCH v1 09/12] serial: 8250_lpss: split LPSS driver to separate module

2016-04-07 Thread Peter Hurley
On 04/07/2016 01:37 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Intes SoCs, such as Braswell, have DesignWare UART. Split out to separate > module which also will be used for Intel Quark later. What's the rationale? And this really isn't a split; this patch introduces a number of significant changes from the

[PATCH v1 09/12] serial: 8250_lpss: split LPSS driver to separate module

2016-04-07 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Intes SoCs, such as Braswell, have DesignWare UART. Split out to separate module which also will be used for Intel Quark later. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_lpss.c | 279

[PATCH v1 09/12] serial: 8250_lpss: split LPSS driver to separate module

2016-04-07 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Intes SoCs, such as Braswell, have DesignWare UART. Split out to separate module which also will be used for Intel Quark later. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_lpss.c | 279 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c | 227