On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:32:33AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:33 AM Christian Brauner
> wrote:
> >
> > With this patch an open() call on /proc/ will give userspace a handle
> > to struct pid of the process associated with /proc/. This allows to
> > maintain a
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:32:33AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:33 AM Christian Brauner
> wrote:
> >
> > With this patch an open() call on /proc/ will give userspace a handle
> > to struct pid of the process associated with /proc/. This allows to
> > maintain a
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:33 AM Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> With this patch an open() call on /proc/ will give userspace a handle
> to struct pid of the process associated with /proc/. This allows to
> maintain a stable handle on a process.
> I have been discussing various approaches extensively
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:33 AM Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> With this patch an open() call on /proc/ will give userspace a handle
> to struct pid of the process associated with /proc/. This allows to
> maintain a stable handle on a process.
> I have been discussing various approaches extensively
With this patch an open() call on /proc/ will give userspace a handle
to struct pid of the process associated with /proc/. This allows to
maintain a stable handle on a process.
I have been discussing various approaches extensively during technical
conferences this year culminating in a long
With this patch an open() call on /proc/ will give userspace a handle
to struct pid of the process associated with /proc/. This allows to
maintain a stable handle on a process.
I have been discussing various approaches extensively during technical
conferences this year culminating in a long
6 matches
Mail list logo