On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:41:31AM -0700, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy wrote:
> On 4/19/19 10:37 AM, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 08:59:18AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 02:11:14PM -0800,
> > > sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > > Fr
Hi,
On 4/19/19 10:37 AM, Raj, Ashok wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 08:59:18AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
Hi Kuppuswamy,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 02:11:14PM -0800,
sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
PF/VF implementation must comply with PCIe s
Hi Kuppuswamy,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 02:11:14PM -0800,
sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
>
> PF/VF implementation must comply with PCIe specification as
> defined in r4.0, sec 9.3.4, 9.3.5, 9.3.6 and 9.3.7. And if
> it does not comply, return
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
PF/VF implementation must comply with PCIe specification as
defined in r4.0, sec 9.3.4, 9.3.5, 9.3.6 and 9.3.7. And if
it does not comply, return error and skip PF/VF device
creation.
Also add a command line parameter support to skip error when
PF/VF spec validat
4 matches
Mail list logo