On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 01:31:54PM -0700, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
> From: Sibi Sankar
>
> In order to land inline coredump support for mss, the dump_segment
> function would need to support granularities less than the segment
> size. This is achieved by replacing mask based tracking with size.
>
On 2020-07-16 01:10, Sibi Sankar wrote:
On 2020-07-14 22:48, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 01:31:54PM -0700, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
From: Sibi Sankar
In order to land inline coredump support for mss, the dump_segment
function would need to support granularities less than th
On 2020-07-14 22:48, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 01:31:54PM -0700, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
From: Sibi Sankar
In order to land inline coredump support for mss, the dump_segment
function would need to support granularities less than the segment
size. This is achieved by repla
On 2020-07-14 22:48, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 01:31:54PM -0700, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
From: Sibi Sankar
In order to land inline coredump support for mss, the dump_segment
function would need to support granularities less than the segment
size. This is achieved by repla
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 01:31:54PM -0700, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
> From: Sibi Sankar
>
> In order to land inline coredump support for mss, the dump_segment
> function would need to support granularities less than the segment
> size. This is achieved by replacing mask based tracking with size.
>
From: Sibi Sankar
In order to land inline coredump support for mss, the dump_segment
function would need to support granularities less than the segment
size. This is achieved by replacing mask based tracking with size.
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar
Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar
---
drivers/re
6 matches
Mail list logo