r-...@vger.kernel.org; j...@resnulli.us;
> Michael Shych <michae...@mellanox.com>; ivec...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/7] platform/mellanox: mlxreg-hotplug: add extra cycle
> for hotplug work queue
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:02:03AM +, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
&g
; j...@resnulli.us;
> Michael Shych ; ivec...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/7] platform/mellanox: mlxreg-hotplug: add extra cycle
> for hotplug work queue
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:02:03AM +, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
> > It adds missed logic for signal acknowledge, by
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:02:03AM +, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
> It adds missed logic for signal acknowledge, by adding an extra run for
> work queue in case a signal is received, but no specific signal assertion
> is detected. Such case theoretically can happen for example in case
> several
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:02:03AM +, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
> It adds missed logic for signal acknowledge, by adding an extra run for
> work queue in case a signal is received, but no specific signal assertion
> is detected. Such case theoretically can happen for example in case
> several
It adds missed logic for signal acknowledge, by adding an extra run for
work queue in case a signal is received, but no specific signal assertion
is detected. Such case theoretically can happen for example in case
several units are removed or inserted at the same time. In this situation
It adds missed logic for signal acknowledge, by adding an extra run for
work queue in case a signal is received, but no specific signal assertion
is detected. Such case theoretically can happen for example in case
several units are removed or inserted at the same time. In this situation
6 matches
Mail list logo
