On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 07:32:24PM +0200, Sebastian Ott wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Ming Lei wrote:
>> > From: Jarod Wilson
>> >
>> > With the mutex_trylock bit gone from blkdev_reread_part(), the retry logic
>> > in dasd_scan_partitions() s
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 07:32:24PM +0200, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Ming Lei wrote:
> > From: Jarod Wilson
> >
> > With the mutex_trylock bit gone from blkdev_reread_part(), the retry logic
> > in dasd_scan_partitions() shouldn't be necessary.
> >
> > CC: Christoph Hellwig
> >
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Ming Lei wrote:
> From: Jarod Wilson
>
> With the mutex_trylock bit gone from blkdev_reread_part(), the retry logic
> in dasd_scan_partitions() shouldn't be necessary.
>
> CC: Christoph Hellwig
> CC: Jens Axboe
> CC: Tejun Heo
> CC: Alexander Viro
> CC: Markus Pargmann
>
From: Jarod Wilson
With the mutex_trylock bit gone from blkdev_reread_part(), the retry logic
in dasd_scan_partitions() shouldn't be necessary.
CC: Christoph Hellwig
CC: Jens Axboe
CC: Tejun Heo
CC: Alexander Viro
CC: Markus Pargmann
CC: Stefan Weinhuber
CC: Stefan Haberland
CC: Sebastian
4 matches
Mail list logo