Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 00/16] On demand paging

2014-09-17 Thread Or Gerlitz
On 9/13/2014 12:16 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: Per your request we provided the information on tests conducted with the patches. Note that the patches can't really disrupt existing applications that don't set the new IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND MR flag when they register memory. Also the whole set of changes

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 00/16] On demand paging

2014-09-12 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014, Haggai Eran wrote: > On 04/09/2014, Roland Dreier wrote: >> Have you done any review or testing of these changes? If so can you >> share the results? > We have tested this feature thoroughly inside Mellanox. We ran random > tests that performed MR registrations, memory mapp

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 00/16] On demand paging

2014-09-10 Thread Sagi Grimberg
On 9/10/2014 11:51 AM, Haggai Eran wrote: The main benefits of ODP is the simplified programming model, simplified management, and avoiding worst-case memory commitment. For example, we were able to run multiple concurrent instances of iSER targets, allowing over-commitment that otherwise would

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 00/16] On demand paging

2014-09-10 Thread Haggai Eran
On 09/09/2014 17:21, Haggai Eran wrote: > On 04/09/2014 00:15, Roland Dreier wrote: >> Have you done any review or testing of these changes? If so can you >> share the results? > > We have tested this feature thoroughly inside Mellanox. We ran random > tests that performed MR registrations, memor

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 00/16] On demand paging

2014-09-09 Thread Haggai Eran
On 04/09/2014 00:15, Roland Dreier wrote: > Have you done any review or testing of these changes? If so can you > share the results? We have tested this feature thoroughly inside Mellanox. We ran random tests that performed MR registrations, memory mappings and unmappings, calls to madvise with M

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 00/16] On demand paging

2014-09-04 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:15:51PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > > I would like to note that we at Los Alamos National Laboratory are very > > interested in this functionality and it would be great if it gets accepted. > > Have you done any review or testing of these changes? If so can you > shar

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 00/16] On demand paging

2014-09-03 Thread Roland Dreier
> I would like to note that we at Los Alamos National Laboratory are very > interested in this functionality and it would be great if it gets accepted. Have you done any review or testing of these changes? If so can you share the results? - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un

Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 00/16] On demand paging

2014-09-03 Thread Or Gerlitz
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On 7/3/2014 11:44 AM, Haggai Eran wrote: >> >> Hi Roland, >> >> I understand that you were reluctant to review these patches as long as >> there was an ongoing debate on whether or not the i_mmap_mutex should be >> changed into a spinlock. >> >> It seems th