Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] Cavium MMC driver

2017-01-20 Thread Jan Glauber
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 09:47:33AM -0800, David Daney wrote: > On 01/19/2017 06:50 AM, Jan Glauber wrote: > [...] > > > >>4) GPIO powers should be modelled as GPIO regulators. I believe we > >>have discussed this earlier as well (I don't really recall in detail > >>about the last things). It gives

Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] Cavium MMC driver

2017-01-19 Thread Ulf Hansson
[...] > I've added a fixed regulator to DT: > > vcc_3v3: regulator-vcc_3v3 { > compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > regulator-name = "VCC_3V3"; > regulator-min-microvolt = <330>; > regulator-max-microvolt = <330>; > >

Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] Cavium MMC driver

2017-01-19 Thread David Daney
On 01/19/2017 06:50 AM, Jan Glauber wrote: [...] 4) GPIO powers should be modelled as GPIO regulators. I believe we have discussed this earlier as well (I don't really recall in detail about the last things). It gives us the opportunity to via the regulator framework to find out the supported v

Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] Cavium MMC driver

2017-01-19 Thread Jan Glauber
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 01:10:56PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On 19 December 2016 at 13:15, Jan Glauber wrote: > > While this patch series seems to be somehow overdue, in the meantime the > > same MMC unit was re-used on Cavium's ThunderX SOC so our interest in making > > progress up

Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] Cavium MMC driver

2016-12-20 Thread Ulf Hansson
> > Hi Uffe, > > thanks for your feedback! To answer only point 6 for now, I was not to > keen on being the next poster of this series ;- Nevertheless, I'm > comitted to keep working on this driver to bring it finally upstream and > also to maintain it in the future. To make this clear I'll add mys

Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] Cavium MMC driver

2016-12-20 Thread Jan Glauber
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 01:10:56PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On 19 December 2016 at 13:15, Jan Glauber wrote: > > While this patch series seems to be somehow overdue, in the meantime the > > same MMC unit was re-used on Cavium's ThunderX SOC so our interest in making > > progress up

Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] Cavium MMC driver

2016-12-20 Thread Ulf Hansson
Hi Jan, On 19 December 2016 at 13:15, Jan Glauber wrote: > While this patch series seems to be somehow overdue, in the meantime the > same MMC unit was re-used on Cavium's ThunderX SOC so our interest in making > progress upstreaming this driver has doubled now... > > Glancing over the history of

[PATCH v10 0/8] Cavium MMC driver

2016-12-19 Thread Jan Glauber
While this patch series seems to be somehow overdue, in the meantime the same MMC unit was re-used on Cavium's ThunderX SOC so our interest in making progress upstreaming this driver has doubled now... Glancing over the history of the series I think most of the high-level comments should be adress