Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] add i2c driver supported for rk3399

2016-06-19 Thread David.Wu
Hi Wolfram, 在 2016/6/17 19:56, Wolfram Sang 写道: Applied whole series to for-next, thanks! This was nicely refactored and easy to review, thanks. Also thanks to all reviewers who helped this series. I fixed one checkpatch issue for you, though: WARNING: Statements should start on a tabstop #278:

Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] add i2c driver supported for rk3399

2016-06-19 Thread David.Wu
Hi Wolfram, 在 2016/6/17 19:56, Wolfram Sang 写道: Applied whole series to for-next, thanks! This was nicely refactored and easy to review, thanks. Also thanks to all reviewers who helped this series. I fixed one checkpatch issue for you, though: WARNING: Statements should start on a tabstop #278:

Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] add i2c driver supported for rk3399

2016-06-17 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 09:57:35PM +0800, David Wu wrote: > There are three points differert from others: > - new method to caculate i2c timings for rk3399 > - pclk and function clk are separated at rk3399 > - add fast-plus mode supported for rk3399 > > David Wu (8): > i2c: rk3x: add document

Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] add i2c driver supported for rk3399

2016-06-09 Thread Heiko Stübner
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2016, 09:47:53 schrieb Wolfram Sang: > > this series looks pretty nice now and it seems most everybody is happy > > with it by now. Do you still have it in your inbox to look at, or should > > David resend it again? > > I use patchwork (as stated in MAINTAINERS), so nothing

Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] add i2c driver supported for rk3399

2016-06-09 Thread Wolfram Sang
> this series looks pretty nice now and it seems most everybody is happy with > it > by now. Do you still have it in your inbox to look at, or should David resend > it again? I use patchwork (as stated in MAINTAINERS), so nothing gets lost as long as it is send to the i2c-list. As long as it s

Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] add i2c driver supported for rk3399

2016-06-08 Thread Heiko Stübner
Hi Wolfram, Am Montag, 16. Mai 2016, 21:57:35 schrieb David Wu: > There are three points differert from others: > - new method to caculate i2c timings for rk3399 > - pclk and function clk are separated at rk3399 > - add fast-plus mode supported for rk3399 this series looks pretty nice now and

Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] add i2c driver supported for rk3399

2016-05-16 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:57 AM, David Wu wrote: > There are three points differert from others: > - new method to caculate i2c timings for rk3399 > - pclk and function clk are separated at rk3399 > - add fast-plus mode supported for rk3399 > > David Wu (8): > i2c: rk3x: add documentatio

[PATCH v10 0/8] add i2c driver supported for rk3399

2016-05-16 Thread David Wu
There are three points differert from others: - new method to caculate i2c timings for rk3399 - pclk and function clk are separated at rk3399 - add fast-plus mode supported for rk3399 David Wu (8): i2c: rk3x: add documentation to fields in "struct rk3x_i2c" i2c: rk3x: use struct "rk3x_i2c_c