Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-02-03 Thread Minchan Kim
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:49:01AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:11:02PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > It's interesting timing, I posted this patch Yew Year's Day > > and receives indepth design review Lunar New Year's Day. :) > > It's almost 0-day review. :) > > That'

Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-02-03 Thread Johannes Weiner
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 03:58:06PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Fri 31-01-14 11:49:01, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:11:02PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > >The only way to make these semantics clean is either > > > > > > > > a) have vrange() return a range ID so t

Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-01-31 Thread Johannes Weiner
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:11:02PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > It's interesting timing, I posted this patch Yew Year's Day > and receives indepth design review Lunar New Year's Day. :) > It's almost 0-day review. :) That's the only way I can do 0-day reviews ;) > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 07:03:59P

Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-01-30 Thread Johannes Weiner
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 05:27:18PM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > On 01/29/2014 10:30 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 05:43:54PM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > >> On 01/28/2014 04:03 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:12:08PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > >>>

Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-01-30 Thread John Stultz
On 01/29/2014 10:30 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 05:43:54PM -0800, John Stultz wrote: >> On 01/28/2014 04:03 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:12:08PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: o Syscall interface >>> Why do we need another syscall for this? Can

Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-01-29 Thread Johannes Weiner
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 05:43:54PM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > On 01/28/2014 04:03 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:12:08PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > >> o Syscall interface > > Why do we need another syscall for this? Can't we extend madvise to > > take MADV_VOLATILE, MA

Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-01-28 Thread Minchan Kim
Hi Hannes, It's interesting timing, I posted this patch Yew Year's Day and receives indepth design review Lunar New Year's Day. :) It's almost 0-day review. :) On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 07:03:59PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote: > Hello Minchan, > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:12:08PM +0900, Minchan

Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-01-28 Thread John Stultz
On 01/28/2014 04:03 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > Hello Minchan, > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:12:08PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> Happy New Year! >> >> I know it's bad timing to send this unfamiliar large patchset for >> review but hope there are some guys with freshed-brain in new

Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-01-28 Thread Johannes Weiner
Hello Minchan, On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:12:08PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hey all, > > Happy New Year! > > I know it's bad timing to send this unfamiliar large patchset for > review but hope there are some guys with freshed-brain in new year > all over the world. :) > And most important thin

Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-01-27 Thread Minchan Kim
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:09:59PM -0800, Taras Glek wrote: > > > John Stultz wrote: > >On 01/27/2014 04:12 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > >>On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:23:17PM -0500, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > >>>- Your number only claimed the effectiveness anon vrange, but not file > >>>vrange. > >>Yes

Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-01-27 Thread Minchan Kim
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 04:42:27PM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > On 01/27/2014 04:12 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:23:17PM -0500, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > >> - Your number only claimed the effectiveness anon vrange, but not file > >> vrange. > > Yes. It's really problem as I

Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-01-27 Thread John Stultz
On 01/27/2014 04:12 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:23:17PM -0500, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> - Your number only claimed the effectiveness anon vrange, but not file >> vrange. > Yes. It's really problem as I said. > From the beginning, John Stultz wanted to promote vrange-file t

Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-01-27 Thread Minchan Kim
Hey KOSAKI, On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:23:17PM -0500, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Hi Minchan, > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > Happy New Year! > > > > I know it's bad timing to send this unfamiliar large patchset for > > review but hope there are some g

Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-01-27 Thread John Stultz
On 01/27/2014 02:23 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Hi Minchan, > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> Happy New Year! >> >> I know it's bad timing to send this unfamiliar large patchset for >> review but hope there are some guys with freshed-brain in new year >> a

Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-01-27 Thread KOSAKI Motohiro
Hi Minchan, On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hey all, > > Happy New Year! > > I know it's bad timing to send this unfamiliar large patchset for > review but hope there are some guys with freshed-brain in new year > all over the world. :) > And most important thing is that bef

[PATCH v10 00/16] Volatile Ranges v10

2014-01-01 Thread Minchan Kim
Hey all, Happy New Year! I know it's bad timing to send this unfamiliar large patchset for review but hope there are some guys with freshed-brain in new year all over the world. :) And most important thing is that before I dive into lots of testing, I'd like to make an agreement on design issues