On 7/14/20 10:19 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 06:34:12AM +, tudor.amba...@microchip.com wrote:
>
>> These four patches are looking good, I had just few minor comments.
>> If you too think that they are ok, would you take them through the
>> SPI tree? If so, I would need an
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 06:34:12AM +, tudor.amba...@microchip.com wrote:
> These four patches are looking good, I had just few minor comments.
> If you too think that they are ok, would you take them through the
> SPI tree? If so, I would need an immutable tag on top of v5.8-rc1
> preferably,
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 00:00:13 +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> This series adds support for octal DTR flashes in the spi-nor framework,
> and then adds hooks for the Cypress Semper and Mircom Xcella flashes to
> allow running them in octal DTR mode. This series assumes that the flash
> is handed to
Hi, Mark,
On 6/23/20 9:30 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> Pratyush Yadav (17):
> spi: spi-mem: allow specifying whether an op is DTR or not
> spi: spi-mem: allow specifying a command's extension
> spi: atmel-quadspi: reject DTR ops
> spi: spi-mtk-nor: reject DTR ops
These four patches are
Hi,
This series adds support for octal DTR flashes in the spi-nor framework,
and then adds hooks for the Cypress Semper and Mircom Xcella flashes to
allow running them in octal DTR mode. This series assumes that the flash
is handed to the kernel in Legacy SPI mode.
Tested on TI J721e EVM with
5 matches
Mail list logo
