Hi Tarek,
On 24.05.2014 11:33, Tarek Dakhran wrote:
> Hi Tomasz
>
> I faced another problem, while changing this patch.
> See below.
>
> On 05/24/2014 01:11 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Hi Tarek,
>>
>> With v2 of the series I mentioned in review of previous version [1],
>> this patch can be
Hi Tomasz
I faced another problem, while changing this patch.
See below.
On 05/24/2014 01:11 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Tarek,
With v2 of the series I mentioned in review of previous version [1],
this patch can be skipped.
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31258.html
Best
Hi Tomasz
I faced another problem, while changing this patch.
See below.
On 05/24/2014 01:11 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Tarek,
With v2 of the series I mentioned in review of previous version [1],
this patch can be skipped.
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31258.html
Best
Hi Tarek,
On 24.05.2014 11:33, Tarek Dakhran wrote:
Hi Tomasz
I faced another problem, while changing this patch.
See below.
On 05/24/2014 01:11 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Tarek,
With v2 of the series I mentioned in review of previous version [1],
this patch can be skipped.
[1]
On 24.05.2014 00:48, Tarek Dakhran wrote:
> Sorry, only now catch it!
> I agree, this patch is not needed anymore, except Kconfig option.
> config SOC_EXYNOS5410 is needed to build clock stuff.
Right, I missed this.
> What is your opinion, Tomasz?
>
I'd suggest re-spinning this series once
Sorry, only now catch it!
I agree, this patch is not needed anymore, except Kconfig option.
config SOC_EXYNOS5410 is needed to build clock stuff.
What is your opinion, Tomasz?
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Tarek Dakhran wrote:
> Hi Tomazs,
>
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Tomasz Figa
On 24.05.2014 00:44, Tarek Dakhran wrote:
> Hi Tomazs,
>
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Hi Tarek,
>>
>> With v2 of the series I mentioned in review of previous version [1],
>> this patch can be skipped.
>>
>> [1]
Hi Tomazs,
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Tarek,
>
> With v2 of the series I mentioned in review of previous version [1],
> this patch can be skipped.
>
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31258.html
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
> On 23.05.2014
Hi Tarek,
With v2 of the series I mentioned in review of previous version [1],
this patch can be skipped.
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31258.html
Best regards,
Tomasz
On 23.05.2014 12:35, Tarek Dakhran wrote:
> EXYNOS5410 is SoC in Samsung's Exynos5 SoC series.
> Add
EXYNOS5410 is SoC in Samsung's Exynos5 SoC series.
Add initial support for this SoC.
Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran
Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig|8
arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 11 ++-
arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c |2 +-
EXYNOS5410 is SoC in Samsung's Exynos5 SoC series.
Add initial support for this SoC.
Signed-off-by: Tarek Dakhran t.dakh...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Tyrtov v.tyr...@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig|8
arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 11 ++-
Hi Tarek,
With v2 of the series I mentioned in review of previous version [1],
this patch can be skipped.
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31258.html
Best regards,
Tomasz
On 23.05.2014 12:35, Tarek Dakhran wrote:
EXYNOS5410 is SoC in Samsung's Exynos5 SoC series.
Add
Hi Tomazs,
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tarek,
With v2 of the series I mentioned in review of previous version [1],
this patch can be skipped.
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31258.html
Best regards,
Tomasz
On
On 24.05.2014 00:44, Tarek Dakhran wrote:
Hi Tomazs,
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tarek,
With v2 of the series I mentioned in review of previous version [1],
this patch can be skipped.
[1]
Sorry, only now catch it!
I agree, this patch is not needed anymore, except Kconfig option.
config SOC_EXYNOS5410 is needed to build clock stuff.
What is your opinion, Tomasz?
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Tarek Dakhran t.dakh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tomazs,
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:11 AM,
On 24.05.2014 00:48, Tarek Dakhran wrote:
Sorry, only now catch it!
I agree, this patch is not needed anymore, except Kconfig option.
config SOC_EXYNOS5410 is needed to build clock stuff.
Right, I missed this.
What is your opinion, Tomasz?
I'd suggest re-spinning this series once more,
16 matches
Mail list logo