On 2017-06-09 10:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 07:12 +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2017-06-08 19:36, Luis Oliveira wrote:
>>> @@ -984,12 +984,12 @@ int i2c_dw_probe(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
>>> }
>>>
>>> i2c_dw_disable_int(dev);
>>> - r =
On 2017-06-09 10:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 07:12 +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2017-06-08 19:36, Luis Oliveira wrote:
>>> @@ -984,12 +984,12 @@ int i2c_dw_probe(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
>>> }
>>>
>>> i2c_dw_disable_int(dev);
>>> - r =
On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 07:12 +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-06-08 19:36, Luis Oliveira wrote:
> > complicated to review. The work here won't bring any additional work
> > to
> > backported fixes because is just style and reordering.
>
> I challenge that. If there is an old bug that existed
On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 07:12 +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-06-08 19:36, Luis Oliveira wrote:
> > complicated to review. The work here won't bring any additional work
> > to
> > backported fixes because is just style and reordering.
>
> I challenge that. If there is an old bug that existed
On 09-Jun-17 6:12, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-06-08 19:36, Luis Oliveira wrote:
>> complicated to review. The work here won't bring any additional work to
>> backported fixes because is just style and reordering.
>
> I challenge that. If there is an old bug that existed before this patch
> that
On 09-Jun-17 6:12, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-06-08 19:36, Luis Oliveira wrote:
>> complicated to review. The work here won't bring any additional work to
>> backported fixes because is just style and reordering.
>
> I challenge that. If there is an old bug that existed before this patch
> that
On 2017-06-08 19:36, Luis Oliveira wrote:
> complicated to review. The work here won't bring any additional work to
> backported fixes because is just style and reordering.
I challenge that. If there is an old bug that existed before this patch
that is fixed in the future after this patch has
On 2017-06-08 19:36, Luis Oliveira wrote:
> complicated to review. The work here won't bring any additional work to
> backported fixes because is just style and reordering.
I challenge that. If there is an old bug that existed before this patch
that is fixed in the future after this patch has
The purpose of this commit is to fix some comments and styling in the
existing code due to the need of reuse this code. What is being made
here is:
- Sorted the headers files
- Corrected some comments style (capital letters, lowcase i2c)
- Reverse tree in the variables declaration
- Add/remove
The purpose of this commit is to fix some comments and styling in the
existing code due to the need of reuse this code. What is being made
here is:
- Sorted the headers files
- Corrected some comments style (capital letters, lowcase i2c)
- Reverse tree in the variables declaration
- Add/remove
10 matches
Mail list logo
