Hello Zhang,
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 11:54:12AM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote:
> Hi Minchan,
>
> On 07/07/2014 08:53 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Linux doesn't have an ability to free pages lazy while other OS
> > already have been supported that named by madvise(MADV_FREE).
> >
> > The gain is clear
Hi Minchan,
On 07/07/2014 08:53 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Linux doesn't have an ability to free pages lazy while other OS
> already have been supported that named by madvise(MADV_FREE).
>
> The gain is clear that kernel can discard freed pages rather than
> swapping out or OOM if memory pressure h
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:41:37PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:53:52AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Linux doesn't have an ability to free pages lazy while other OS
> > already have been supported that named by madvise(MADV_FREE).
> >
> > The gain is clear that ke
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:53:52AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Linux doesn't have an ability to free pages lazy while other OS
> already have been supported that named by madvise(MADV_FREE).
>
> The gain is clear that kernel can discard freed pages rather than
> swapping out or OOM if memory press
Linux doesn't have an ability to free pages lazy while other OS
already have been supported that named by madvise(MADV_FREE).
The gain is clear that kernel can discard freed pages rather than
swapping out or OOM if memory pressure happens.
Without memory pressure, freed pages would be reused by u
5 matches
Mail list logo