On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Currently, the start address of physical memory is obtained by masking
> the program counter with a fixed mask of 0xf800. This mask value
> was chosen as a balance between the requirements of different platforms.
> However, this does require tha
Hi Russell,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 3:05 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 01:19:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S
> > b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S
> > index d9cce7238a365081..1b6425df87e84e71 100644
> > --
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 01:19:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S
> index d9cce7238a365081..1b6425df87e84e71 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S
> @@ -282,10 +282,36
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 13:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Currently, the start address of physical memory is obtained by masking
> the program counter with a fixed mask of 0xf800. This mask value
> was chosen as a balance between the requirements of different platforms.
> However, this does
Currently, the start address of physical memory is obtained by masking
the program counter with a fixed mask of 0xf800. This mask value
was chosen as a balance between the requirements of different platforms.
However, this does require that the start address of physical memory is
a multiple of
5 matches
Mail list logo