On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:55:21AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 00:39:51 +0200
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200
> > Pierre Morel wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
> > > to validat
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:39:51AM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200
> Pierre Morel wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
> > to validate VIRTIO device features.
>
> Michael, is this going in via your tree?
I gu
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 00:39:51 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200
> Pierre Morel wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
> > to validate VIRTIO device features.
>
> Michael, is this going in via your tree?
>
I bel
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
> to validate VIRTIO device features.
Michael, is this going in via your tree?
Hi all,
The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
to validate VIRTIO device features.
The tests are back to virtio_finalize_features.
No more argument for the architecture callback which only reports
if the architecture needs guest memory access restrictions for
VIRTIO.
I r
5 matches
Mail list logo
