On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 04:07:36PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> From: Glauber Costa
>
> Without the surrounding infrastructure, this patch is a bit of a hammer:
> it will basically shrink objects from all memcgs under memcg pressure.
> At least, however, we will keep the scan limited to the
From: Glauber Costa
Without the surrounding infrastructure, this patch is a bit of a hammer:
it will basically shrink objects from all memcgs under memcg pressure.
At least, however, we will keep the scan limited to the shrinkers marked
as per-memcg.
Future patches will implement the
From: Glauber Costa glom...@openvz.org
Without the surrounding infrastructure, this patch is a bit of a hammer:
it will basically shrink objects from all memcgs under memcg pressure.
At least, however, we will keep the scan limited to the shrinkers marked
as per-memcg.
Future patches will
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 04:07:36PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
From: Glauber Costa glom...@openvz.org
Without the surrounding infrastructure, this patch is a bit of a hammer:
it will basically shrink objects from all memcgs under memcg pressure.
At least, however, we will keep the scan
From: Glauber Costa
Without the surrounding infrastructure, this patch is a bit of a hammer:
it will basically shrink objects from all memcgs under memcg pressure.
At least, however, we will keep the scan limited to the shrinkers marked
as per-memcg.
Future patches will implement the
From: Glauber Costa glom...@openvz.org
Without the surrounding infrastructure, this patch is a bit of a hammer:
it will basically shrink objects from all memcgs under memcg pressure.
At least, however, we will keep the scan limited to the shrinkers marked
as per-memcg.
Future patches will
6 matches
Mail list logo