On 11/5/20 7:27 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 16:20:26 -0500
Tony Krowiak wrote:
But I'm sure the code is suggesting it can, because
vfio_ap_mdev_filter_guest_matrix() has a third parameter called filter_apid,
which governs whether the apm or the aqm bit should be removed. And
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 16:20:26 -0500
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> > But I'm sure the code is suggesting it can, because
> > vfio_ap_mdev_filter_guest_matrix() has a third parameter called filter_apid,
> > which governs whether the apm or the aqm bit should be removed. And
> >
On 11/4/20 7:52 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:49:21 -0500
Tony Krowiak wrote:
+void vfio_ap_mdev_hot_unplug_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
+{
+ unsigned long apid = AP_QID_CARD(q->apqn);
+
+ if ((q->matrix_mdev == NULL) ||
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:49:21 -0500
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> > We do this to show the no queues but bits set output in show? We could
> > get rid of some code if we were to not z
Managed to delete "eroize" fro "zeroize"
>
> I'm not sure what you are saying/asking here. The reason for this
> is
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:49:21 -0500
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> >>
> >> +void vfio_ap_mdev_hot_unplug_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
> >> +{
> >> + unsigned long apid = AP_QID_CARD(q->apqn);
> >> +
> >> + if ((q->matrix_mdev == NULL) || !vfio_ap_mdev_has_crycb(q->matrix_mdev))
> >> +
On 10/28/20 9:57 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:12:03 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
In response to the probe or remove of a queue device, if a KVM guest is
using the matrix mdev to which the APQN of the queue device is assigned,
the vfio_ap device driver must respond
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:12:03 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> In response to the probe or remove of a queue device, if a KVM guest is
> using the matrix mdev to which the APQN of the queue device is assigned,
> the vfio_ap device driver must respond accordingly. In an ideal world, the
> queue device
On 10/22/20 4:30 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
Hi Tony,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on s390/features]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master kvms390/next linux/master v5.9
next-20201022]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly
Hi Tony,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on s390/features]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master kvms390/next linux/master v5.9
next-20201022]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we
In response to the probe or remove of a queue device, if a KVM guest is
using the matrix mdev to which the APQN of the queue device is assigned,
the vfio_ap device driver must respond accordingly. In an ideal world, the
queue device being probed would be hot plugged into the guest. Likewise,
the
10 matches
Mail list logo
