On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 04:07:42PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> FS-shrinkers, which shrink dcaches and icaches, keep dentries and inodes
> in list_lru structures in order to evict least recently used objects.
> With per-memcg kmem shrinking infrastructure introduced, we have to make
> those
FS-shrinkers, which shrink dcaches and icaches, keep dentries and inodes
in list_lru structures in order to evict least recently used objects.
With per-memcg kmem shrinking infrastructure introduced, we have to make
those LRU lists per-memcg in order to allow shrinking FS caches that
belong to
FS-shrinkers, which shrink dcaches and icaches, keep dentries and inodes
in list_lru structures in order to evict least recently used objects.
With per-memcg kmem shrinking infrastructure introduced, we have to make
those LRU lists per-memcg in order to allow shrinking FS caches that
belong to
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 04:07:42PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
FS-shrinkers, which shrink dcaches and icaches, keep dentries and inodes
in list_lru structures in order to evict least recently used objects.
With per-memcg kmem shrinking infrastructure introduced, we have to make
those LRU
FS-shrinkers, which shrink dcaches and icaches, keep dentries and inodes
in list_lru structures in order to evict least recently used objects.
With per-memcg kmem shrinking infrastructure introduced, we have to make
those LRU lists per-memcg in order to allow shrinking FS caches that
belong to
FS-shrinkers, which shrink dcaches and icaches, keep dentries and inodes
in list_lru structures in order to evict least recently used objects.
With per-memcg kmem shrinking infrastructure introduced, we have to make
those LRU lists per-memcg in order to allow shrinking FS caches that
belong to
6 matches
Mail list logo
