Re: [PATCH v12 0/2] UIO support for dfl devices

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:10:05PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote: > Hi Greg: > > I listed below some answers from Moritz and Yilun from previous mails for > your question. > > Do you have more comments? Nah, it's fine, now queued up, thanks. greg k-h

Re: [PATCH v12 0/2] UIO support for dfl devices

Hi Xu, On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 04:22:17PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote: > Hi Moritz: > > Sorry I need to get back to you again, seems no more comments from Greg. > > The patchset is stuck here for more than 1 month. Do you have some > more suggestion that could make it move forward? Do you have some

Re: [PATCH v12 0/2] UIO support for dfl devices

Hi Moritz: Sorry I need to get back to you again, seems no more comments from Greg. The patchset is stuck here for more than 1 month. Do you have some more suggestion that could make it move forward? Do you have some more comments? Or give an acked-by? Or could you apply it to your fpga branch

Re: [PATCH v12 0/2] UIO support for dfl devices

Hi Greg: I listed below some answers from Moritz and Yilun from previous mails for your question. Do you have more comments? Thanks in advance, Yilun On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:59:34AM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote: > This patchset supports some dfl device drivers written in userspace. > > There are

[PATCH v12 0/2] UIO support for dfl devices

This patchset supports some dfl device drivers written in userspace. There are some Q about why UIO driver is needed in v11: >From Greg: Why are you saying that an ethernet driver should be using the UIO interface? And why can't you use the existing UIO drivers that bind to memory