On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
>> At the same time, can you kill __pci_mmap_set_pgprot() for powerpc.
>
> Can you please put your two patches and this attached one into to pci/next?
>
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
>> At the same time, can you kill __pci_mmap_set_pgprot() for powerpc.
>
> Can you please put your two patches and this attached one into to pci/next?
>
> Then I could send updated PCI: Let
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> At the same time, can you kill __pci_mmap_set_pgprot() for powerpc.
Can you please put your two patches and this attached one into to pci/next?
Then I could send updated PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> At the same time, can you kill __pci_mmap_set_pgprot() for powerpc.
Can you please put your two patches and this attached one into to pci/next?
Then I could send updated PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource address.
Thanks
Yinghai
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> Microblaze does look up the resource in pci_mmap_page_range(), but it
> never actually uses it. It *looks* like it uses it, but that code is
> actually dead and I think we should apply the first patch below.
Good one.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> Microblaze does look up the resource in pci_mmap_page_range(), but it
> never actually uses it. It *looks* like it uses it, but that code is
> actually dead and I think we should apply the first patch below.
Good one.
>
> That leaves
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 05:06:28PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> This one is preparing patch for next one:
> PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource addr
>
> We need to pass extra resource pointer to avoid searching that again
> for powerpc and microblaze prot set operation.
I'm not
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 05:06:28PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> This one is preparing patch for next one:
> PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource addr
>
> We need to pass extra resource pointer to avoid searching that again
> for powerpc and microblaze prot set operation.
I'm not
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 05:06:28PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> This one is preparing patch for next one:
> PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource addr
>
> We need to pass extra resource pointer to avoid searching that again
> for powerpc and microblaze prot set operation.
>
>
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 05:06:28PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> This one is preparing patch for next one:
> PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource addr
>
> We need to pass extra resource pointer to avoid searching that again
> for powerpc and microblaze prot set operation.
>
>
This one is preparing patch for next one:
PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource addr
We need to pass extra resource pointer to avoid searching that again
for powerpc and microblaze prot set operation.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu
Cc:
This one is preparing patch for next one:
PCI: Let pci_mmap_page_range() take resource addr
We need to pass extra resource pointer to avoid searching that again
for powerpc and microblaze prot set operation.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Cc:
12 matches
Mail list logo