On 02/21/2018 05:55 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> From: Thiago Jung Bauermann
>
> The sig_chld() handler calls dprintf2() taking care of setting
> dprint_in_signal so that sigsafe_printf() won't call printf().
> Unfortunately, this precaution is is negated by dprintf_level(),
On 02/21/2018 05:55 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> From: Thiago Jung Bauermann
>
> The sig_chld() handler calls dprintf2() taking care of setting
> dprint_in_signal so that sigsafe_printf() won't call printf().
> Unfortunately, this precaution is is negated by dprintf_level(), which
> has a call to
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:55:41 -0800
Ram Pai wrote:
> From: Thiago Jung Bauermann
>
> The sig_chld() handler calls dprintf2() taking care of setting
> dprint_in_signal so that sigsafe_printf() won't call printf().
> Unfortunately, this precaution
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:55:41 -0800
Ram Pai wrote:
> From: Thiago Jung Bauermann
>
> The sig_chld() handler calls dprintf2() taking care of setting
> dprint_in_signal so that sigsafe_printf() won't call printf().
> Unfortunately, this precaution is is negated by dprintf_level(), which
> has a
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann
The sig_chld() handler calls dprintf2() taking care of setting
dprint_in_signal so that sigsafe_printf() won't call printf().
Unfortunately, this precaution is is negated by dprintf_level(), which
has a call to fflush().
This function
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann
The sig_chld() handler calls dprintf2() taking care of setting
dprint_in_signal so that sigsafe_printf() won't call printf().
Unfortunately, this precaution is is negated by dprintf_level(), which
has a call to fflush().
This function acquires a lock, which means
6 matches
Mail list logo