Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] Per-user clock constraints

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On 01/29/2015 03:26 AM, Mike Turquette wrote: >> Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2015-01-27 22:59:59) >>> On 01/27/2015 01:55 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 01/23/15 03:03, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi, > > in this v13 I have: > > * ad

Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] Per-user clock constraints

On 01/29/2015 03:26 AM, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2015-01-27 22:59:59) >> On 01/27/2015 01:55 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 01/23/15 03:03, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Hi, in this v13 I have: * added the latest R-b tags from Stephen, * split some line

Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] Per-user clock constraints

On 01/27/2015 01:55 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 01/23/15 03:03, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Hi, >> >> in this v13 I have: >> >> * added the latest R-b tags from Stephen, >> >> * split some lines that went over the 80-char limit, >> >> * made explicit in the docs that the range limits are inclusive, and

Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] Per-user clock constraints

On 01/27/2015 01:55 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 01/23/15 03:03, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Hi, >> >> in this v13 I have: >> >> * added the latest R-b tags from Stephen, >> >> * split some lines that went over the 80-char limit, >> >> * made explicit in the docs that the range limits are inclusive, and

Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] Per-user clock constraints

On 01/23/15 03:03, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi, > > in this v13 I have: > > * added the latest R-b tags from Stephen, > > * split some lines that went over the 80-char limit, > > * made explicit in the docs that the range limits are inclusive, and > > * removed an ifdef in clkdev.c by adding a dev_id

[PATCH v13 0/6] Per-user clock constraints

Hi, in this v13 I have: * added the latest R-b tags from Stephen, * split some lines that went over the 80-char limit, * made explicit in the docs that the range limits are inclusive, and * removed an ifdef in clkdev.c by adding a dev_id param to __of_clk_get_by_name. The first patch just rem