Re: [PATCH v13 0/8] ARM: berlin: add AHCI support

2014-07-30 Thread Sebastian Hesselbarth
On 07/30/2014 07:09 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Applied 3-5 to libata/for-3.17. I suppose 6-8 are gonna routed > through a different tree? Tejun, IMHO you should also take 6 ("Documentation: bindings: document the sub-nodes AHCI bindings"). Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "

Re: [PATCH v13 0/8] ARM: berlin: add AHCI support

2014-07-30 Thread Antoine Ténart
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 01:18:29PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 01:09:23PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Applied 3-5 to libata/for-3.17. I suppose 6-8 are gonna routed > > through a different tree? > > Reverted due to build failulre. Can you please look into it

Re: [PATCH v13 0/8] ARM: berlin: add AHCI support

2014-07-30 Thread Tejun Heo
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 01:09:23PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > Applied 3-5 to libata/for-3.17. I suppose 6-8 are gonna routed > through a different tree? Reverted due to build failulre. Can you please look into it? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un

Re: [PATCH v13 0/8] ARM: berlin: add AHCI support

2014-07-30 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Applied 3-5 to libata/for-3.17. I suppose 6-8 are gonna routed through a different tree? Thanks a lot for the patience. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http:

[PATCH v13 0/8] ARM: berlin: add AHCI support

2014-07-30 Thread Antoine Ténart
Kishon already took patches 1-2. Changes since v12: - rebased on top of libata/for-3.17 (with libata/for-3.16-fixes pulled in) - removed the host_flags argument - added a comment in ahci_host_priv for the inputs Changes since v11: - fixed a small issue