On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, 禹舟键 wrote:
> Hi David
> Could I use use plain old %d? Just like this,
> pr_cont(",task=%s,pid=%d,uid=%d\n", p->comm, p->pid,
> from_kuid(&init_user_ns, task_uid(p)));
>
Yes please!
Hi David
Could I use use plain old %d? Just like this,
pr_cont(",task=%s,pid=%d,uid=%d\n", p->comm, p->pid,
from_kuid(&init_user_ns, task_uid(p)));
Thanks
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, ufo19890...@gmail.com wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 531b2c86d4db..7fbd389ea779 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -434,10 +434,11 @@ static void dump_header(struct oom_control *oc, struct
> task_struct *p)
>
On Fri 13-07-18 19:55:52, ufo19890...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: yuzhoujian
>
> The current oom report doesn't display victim's memcg context during the
> global OOM situation. While this information is not strictly needed, it
> can be really helpful for containerized environments to locate which
>
From: yuzhoujian
The current oom report doesn't display victim's memcg context during the
global OOM situation. While this information is not strictly needed, it
can be really helpful for containerized environments to locate which
container has lost a process. Now that we have a single line for t
On Wed 11-07-18 18:31:18, 禹舟键 wrote:
> Hi Michal
>
> I think the single line output you want is just like that:
>
> oom-kill:constraint=,nodemask=,cpuset=,mems_allowed=,oom_memcg=,task_memcg=,task=,pid=,uid=
>
> Am I right?
exactly.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Hi Michal
I think the single line output you want is just like that:
oom-kill:constraint=,nodemask=,cpuset=,mems_allowed=,oom_memcg=,task_memcg=,task=,pid=,uid=
Am I right?
On Wed 11-07-18 11:39:29, 禹舟键 wrote:
> Hi Michal
> Sorry , I l forget to update the changlog for the second patch, but
> the cpuset information is not missing.
The cpuset information is missing in the changelog.
> Do I still need to make the
> v14 or just update the changelog for v13?
Wait for
Hi Michal
Sorry , I l forget to update the changlog for the second patch, but
the cpuset information is not missing. Do I still need to make the
v14 or just update the changelog for v13?
Thanks
On Tue 10-07-18 18:19:48, ufo19890...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: yuzhoujian
>
> The current oom report doesn't display victim's memcg context during the
> global OOM situation. While this information is not strictly needed, it
> can be really helpful for containerized environments to locate which
>
From: yuzhoujian
The current oom report doesn't display victim's memcg context during the
global OOM situation. While this information is not strictly needed, it
can be really helpful for containerized environments to locate which
container has lost a process. Now that we have a single line for t
11 matches
Mail list logo