* Tony Lindgren [150202 11:28]:
> * Mike Turquette [150202 09:50]:
> > Quoting Tony Lindgren (2015-02-02 08:12:37)
> > >
> > > [ 10.568206] [ cut here ]
> > > [ 10.568206] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/clk/clk.c:925
> > > clk_disable+0x28/0x34()
> > > [ 10.5682
* Mike Turquette [150202 09:50]:
> Quoting Tony Lindgren (2015-02-02 08:12:37)
> >
> > [ 10.568206] [ cut here ]
> > [ 10.568206] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/clk/clk.c:925
> > clk_disable+0x28/0x34()
> > [ 10.568237] Modules linked in:
> > [ 10.568237] CPU:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:46:46AM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
> This looks like mis-matched enable/disable calls. We now have unique
> struct clk pointers for every call to clk_get. I haven't yet looked
> through the hwmod code but I have a feeling that we're doing something
> like this:
>
>
Quoting Tony Lindgren (2015-02-02 08:12:37)
> * Geert Uytterhoeven [150202 00:03]:
> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Mike Turquette
> > wrote:
> > > Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2015-01-31 10:36:22)
> > >> On 31 January 2015 at 02:31, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >> > On 01/29, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >
* Geert Uytterhoeven [150202 00:03]:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2015-01-31 10:36:22)
> >> On 31 January 2015 at 02:31, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> > On 01/29, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> >> On 01/29/15 05:31, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> >> > H
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2015-01-31 10:36:22)
>> On 31 January 2015 at 02:31, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> > On 01/29, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> >> On 01/29/15 05:31, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >> > Hi Tomeu, Mike,
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Jan 23, 201
Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2015-01-31 10:36:22)
> On 31 January 2015 at 02:31, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 01/29, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> On 01/29/15 05:31, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> > Hi Tomeu, Mike,
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> --- a/drivers
On 31 January 2015 at 02:31, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/29, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 01/29/15 05:31, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > Hi Tomeu, Mike,
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
>> > wrote:
>> >> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> >> @@ -2391,25
On 01/29, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/29/15 05:31, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Tomeu, Mike,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
> > wrote:
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> >> @@ -2391,25 +2543,24 @@ int __clk_get(struct clk *clk)
> >> retu
On 01/29/15 05:31, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Tomeu, Mike,
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
> wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> @@ -2391,25 +2543,24 @@ int __clk_get(struct clk *clk)
>> return 1;
>> }
>>
>> -static void clk_core_put(stru
Hi Tomeu, Mike,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
wrote:
> Adds a way for clock consumers to set maximum and minimum rates. This
> can be used for thermal drivers to set minimum rates, or by misc.
> drivers to set maximum rates to assure a minimum performance level.
>
> Changes the s
Adds a way for clock consumers to set maximum and minimum rates. This
can be used for thermal drivers to set minimum rates, or by misc.
drivers to set maximum rates to assure a minimum performance level.
Changes the signature of the determine_rate callback by adding the
parameters min_rate and max
12 matches
Mail list logo