On 07/29/2016 04:38 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 5 April 2016 at 04:06, Yakir Yang wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On 03/31/2016 06:15 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:08:05PM +0800, Yakir Yang wrote:
Hi all,
The Samsung Exynos eDP controller and Rockchip RK3288 eDP controller
shar
On 5 April 2016 at 04:06, Yakir Yang wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
>
> On 03/31/2016 06:15 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:08:05PM +0800, Yakir Yang wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>The Samsung Exynos eDP controller and Rockchip RK3288 eDP controller
>>> share the same IP, so a
Hi Daniel,
On 03/31/2016 06:15 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:08:05PM +0800, Yakir Yang wrote:
Hi all,
The Samsung Exynos eDP controller and Rockchip RK3288 eDP controller
share the same IP, so a lot of parts can be re-used. I split the common
code into bridge directory
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:15:35PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:08:05PM +0800, Yakir Yang wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The Samsung Exynos eDP controller and Rockchip RK3288 eDP controller
> > share the same IP, so a lot of parts can be re-used. I split the common
>
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:08:05PM +0800, Yakir Yang wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The Samsung Exynos eDP controller and Rockchip RK3288 eDP controller
> share the same IP, so a lot of parts can be re-used. I split the common
> code into bridge directory, then rk3288 and exynos only need to keep
> som
Am Montag, 15. Februar 2016, 19:08:05 schrieb Yakir Yang:
> Hi all,
>
> The Samsung Exynos eDP controller and Rockchip RK3288 eDP controller
> share the same IP, so a lot of parts can be re-used. I split the common
> code into bridge directory, then rk3288 and exynos only need to keep
> some pla
On 03/22/2016 08:41 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
So although it's small framework or just subdirectory, we would need
someone who can manage the framework to avoid further confusion if
necessary.
So maybe it just doesn't need a maintainer, and maybe those the owner
of the bridge driver should be resp
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:41:58AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> >> So although it's small framework or just subdirectory, we would need
> >> someone who can manage the framework to avoid further confusion if
> >> necessary.
> >
> > So maybe it just doesn't need a maintainer, and maybe those the
On 2016年03月23日 08:41, Dave Airlie wrote:
So although it's small framework or just subdirectory, we would need
someone who can manage the framework to avoid further confusion if
necessary.
So maybe it just doesn't need a maintainer, and maybe those the owner
of the bridge driver should be respons
>
>> So although it's small framework or just subdirectory, we would need
>> someone who can manage the framework to avoid further confusion if
>> necessary.
>
> So maybe it just doesn't need a maintainer, and maybe those the owner
> of the bridge driver should be responsible for choosing the tree
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 08:54:15AM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
>
Please wrap your long lines.
>
> 2016년 03월 23일 08:39에 Russell King - ARM Linux 이(가) 쓴 글:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 08:09:33AM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> >> In this case, someone else may send an email again like you "who is going
> >>
2016년 03월 23일 08:39에 Russell King - ARM Linux 이(가) 쓴 글:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 08:09:33AM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
>> In this case, someone else may send an email again like you "who is going to
>> merge?"
>> That would be why we need a maintainer.
>>
>> drm panel is already managed well by Thi
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 08:09:33AM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> In this case, someone else may send an email again like you "who is going to
> merge?"
> That would be why we need a maintainer.
>
> drm panel is already managed well by Thierry Reding without such confusion.
You don't need a maintaine
2016년 03월 23일 07:52에 Heiko Stübner 이(가) 쓴 글:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. März 2016, 07:44:59 schrieb Inki Dae:
>> + Ajay kumar with Samsung email
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2016년 03월 23일 07:12에 Heiko Stübner 이(가) 쓴 글:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Am Dienstag, 22. März 2016, 16:19:37 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
On 03/1
Am Mittwoch, 23. März 2016, 07:44:59 schrieb Inki Dae:
> + Ajay kumar with Samsung email
>
> Hi,
>
> 2016년 03월 23일 07:12에 Heiko Stübner 이(가) 쓴 글:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Dienstag, 22. März 2016, 16:19:37 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> >> On 03/18/2016 07:53 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> >>> On Thu,
+ Ajay kumar with Samsung email
Hi,
2016년 03월 23일 07:12에 Heiko Stübner 이(가) 쓴 글:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, 22. März 2016, 16:19:37 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
>> On 03/18/2016 07:53 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Caesar Wang
> wrote:
>> Same here, this is the
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 22. März 2016, 16:19:37 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> On 03/18/2016 07:53 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Caesar Wang
wrote:
> Same here, this is the second time I tested this series (first time was
> v6 on October 25 [2]) and I think that ha
Hello,
On 03/18/2016 07:53 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Caesar Wang
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I pick this series up and test on C101PA chromebook, after Heiko update the
>> 3 patches.
>>
>> [v14.1,09/17] drm: rockchip: dp: add rockchip platform dp driver
Hi all,
I pick this series up and test on C101PA chromebook, after Heiko update
the 3 patches.
[v14.1,09/17] drm: rockchip: dp: add rockchip platform dp driver
[v14.1,04/17] drm: bridge: analogix/dp: fix some obvious code style
[v14.1,01/17] drm: bridge: analogix/dp: split exynos dp driver to
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Caesar Wang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I pick this series up and test on C101PA chromebook, after Heiko update the
> 3 patches.
>
> [v14.1,09/17] drm: rockchip: dp: add rockchip platform dp driver
> [v14.1,04/17] drm: bridge: analogix/dp: fix some obvious code styl
Hi all,
The Samsung Exynos eDP controller and Rockchip RK3288 eDP controller
share the same IP, so a lot of parts can be re-used. I split the common
code into bridge directory, then rk3288 and exynos only need to keep
some platform code. Cause I can't find the exact IP name of exynos dp
control
21 matches
Mail list logo