Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:39:52PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: >> > It still has the same crappy fs interfaces with lots of boilerplate >> > code >> >> Could you please be more specific so that I can trace this complaint >> to some

Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:39:52PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: >> > It still has the same crappy fs interfaces with lots of boilerplate >> > code >> >> Could you please be more specific so that I can trace this

Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:39:52PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > It still has the same crappy fs interfaces with lots of boilerplate > > code > > Could you please be more specific so that I can trace this complaint > to some actual code? if (IS_RICHACL()) richacl_foo() else

Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 06:58:19PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:07 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:43:46AM -0600, Steve French wrote: > >> I don't have strong disagreement with using pseudo-xattrs to > >> store/retrieve ACLs (we already

Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:07 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:43:46AM -0600, Steve French wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig >> > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at

Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:43:46AM -0600, Steve French wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher > wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig > > wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:08:41PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > >>> Here is another update

Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig > wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:08:41PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: >>> Here is another update to the richacl patch queue. This posting contains >>> the patches ready

Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:08:41PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: >> Here is another update to the richacl patch queue. This posting contains >> the patches ready to be merged; the patches later in the queue still need >> some more

Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:08:41PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Here is another update to the richacl patch queue. This posting contains > the patches ready to be merged; the patches later in the queue still need > some more review. It still has the same crappy fs interfaces with lots of

Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:43:46AM -0600, Steve French wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher > wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig > > wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:08:41PM +0100, Andreas

Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig > wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:08:41PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: >>> Here is another update to the richacl patch queue.

Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:07 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:43:46AM -0600, Steve French wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig

Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 06:58:19PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:07 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:43:46AM -0600, Steve French wrote: > >> I don't have strong disagreement with using pseudo-xattrs to > >>

Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:08:41PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Here is another update to the richacl patch queue. This posting contains > the patches ready to be merged; the patches later in the queue still need > some more review. It still has the same crappy fs interfaces with lots of

Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:08:41PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: >> Here is another update to the richacl patch queue. This posting contains >> the patches ready to be merged; the patches later in the queue

Re: [PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:39:52PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > It still has the same crappy fs interfaces with lots of boilerplate > > code > > Could you please be more specific so that I can trace this complaint > to some actual code? if (IS_RICHACL()) richacl_foo() else

[PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

Here is another update to the richacl patch queue. This posting contains the patches ready to be merged; the patches later in the queue still need some more review. Changes since the last posting (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cifs/11221): * Replacing an existing file or

[PATCH v15 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)

Here is another update to the richacl patch queue. This posting contains the patches ready to be merged; the patches later in the queue still need some more review. Changes since the last posting (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cifs/11221): * Replacing an existing file or