On 2019/4/18 21:00, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 4:01 PM Andrew Morton
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:32:48 +0800 Aubrey Li
>>> wrote:
>>>
The architecture specific information of the running processes could
>>
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 4:01 PM Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:32:48 +0800 Aubrey Li
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The architecture specific information of the running processes could
> > > be useful to the userland. Add support to ex
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 4:01 PM Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:32:48 +0800 Aubrey Li
> wrote:
>
> > The architecture specific information of the running processes could
> > be useful to the userland. Add support to examine process architecture
> > specific information externally
On 2019/4/17 7:01, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:32:48 +0800 Aubrey Li
> wrote:
>
>> The architecture specific information of the running processes could
>> be useful to the userland. Add support to examine process architecture
>> specific information externally.
>
> The impleme
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:32:48 +0800 Aubrey Li wrote:
> The architecture specific information of the running processes could
> be useful to the userland. Add support to examine process architecture
> specific information externally.
The implementation looks just fine to me. Have you had any feedb
The architecture specific information of the running processes could
be useful to the userland. Add support to examine process architecture
specific information externally.
Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Tim Chen
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Arjan van de Ven
Cc: Linux
6 matches
Mail list logo