Re: [PATCH v17 00/20] iommu/arm-smmu + drm/msm: per-process GPU pgtables

2020-09-21 Thread Jordan Crouse
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:30:57PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 01:04:06PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: > > From: Rob Clark > > > > NOTE: I have re-ordered the series, and propose that we could merge this > > series in the following order: > > > >1) 01-11 - merge

Re: [PATCH v17 00/20] iommu/arm-smmu + drm/msm: per-process GPU pgtables

2020-09-21 Thread Rob Clark
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 2:31 PM Will Deacon wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 01:04:06PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: > > From: Rob Clark > > > > NOTE: I have re-ordered the series, and propose that we could merge this > > series in the following order: > > > >1) 01-11 - merge via drm

Re: [PATCH v17 00/20] iommu/arm-smmu + drm/msm: per-process GPU pgtables

2020-09-21 Thread Will Deacon
On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 01:04:06PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: > From: Rob Clark > > NOTE: I have re-ordered the series, and propose that we could merge this > series in the following order: > >1) 01-11 - merge via drm / msm-next >2) 12-15 - merge via iommu, no dependency on

[PATCH v17 00/20] iommu/arm-smmu + drm/msm: per-process GPU pgtables

2020-09-05 Thread Rob Clark
From: Rob Clark NOTE: I have re-ordered the series, and propose that we could merge this series in the following order: 1) 01-11 - merge via drm / msm-next 2) 12-15 - merge via iommu, no dependency on msm-next pull req 3) 16-18 - patch 16 has a dependency on 02 and