> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 02:25:52PM -0700, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > >
> > > That being said, this in no way impacts KVM's ability to virtualize SGX,
> > > e.g.
> > > KVM can directly do CPUID and {RD,WR}MSR to probe the capabilities
> > > of the platform as needed.
> >
> > I am not following. KVM
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 02:25:52PM -0700, Huang, Kai wrote:
> >
> > That being said, this in no way impacts KVM's ability to virtualize SGX,
> > e.g.
> > KVM can directly do CPUID and {RD,WR}MSR to probe the capabilities of the
> > platform as needed.
>
> I am not following. KVM can do whatever
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:17:40AM -0700, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-03-20 at 18:21 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > From: Sean Christopherson
> > >
> > > Similar to other large Intel features such as VMX and TXT, SGX must
> > > be explicitly enabled in IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR to
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:17:40AM -0700, Huang, Kai wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-03-20 at 18:21 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > From: Sean Christopherson
> >
> > Similar to other large Intel features such as VMX and TXT, SGX must be
> > explicitly enabled in IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR to be truly
On Wed, 2019-03-20 at 18:21 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson
>
> Similar to other large Intel features such as VMX and TXT, SGX must be
> explicitly enabled in IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR to be truly usable.
> Clear all SGX related capabilities if SGX is not fully enabled
From: Sean Christopherson
Similar to other large Intel features such as VMX and TXT, SGX must be
explicitly enabled in IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR to be truly usable.
Clear all SGX related capabilities if SGX is not fully enabled in
IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL or if the SGX1 instruction set isn't
6 matches
Mail list logo
