Re: [PATCH v2][next] printk: ringbuffer: support dataless records

2020-08-04 Thread Petr Mladek
On Tue 2020-07-21 15:31:28, John Ogness wrote: > With commit ("printk: use the lockless ringbuffer"), printk() > started silently dropping messages without text because such > records are not supported by the new printk ringbuffer. > > Add support for such records. > > Currently dataless records

Re: [PATCH v2][next] printk: ringbuffer: support dataless records

2020-07-27 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (20/07/21 15:31), John Ogness wrote: > With commit ("printk: use the lockless ringbuffer"), printk() > started silently dropping messages without text because such > records are not supported by the new printk ringbuffer. > > Add support for such records. > > Currently dataless records are

[PATCH v2][next] printk: ringbuffer: support dataless records

2020-07-21 Thread John Ogness
With commit ("printk: use the lockless ringbuffer"), printk() started silently dropping messages without text because such records are not supported by the new printk ringbuffer. Add support for such records. Currently dataless records are denoted by INVALID_LPOS in order to recognize failed