On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Chanho Min wrote:
>> Anyway I just want to know we still need auto scale of poll rate.
> I correct the mistake in this sentence.
> Anyway I just want to know whether we still need auto scale of poll rate or
> not.
For the console/TTY and modem usecase I think
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Chanho Min chanho@lge.com wrote:
Anyway I just want to know we still need auto scale of poll rate.
I correct the mistake in this sentence.
Anyway I just want to know whether we still need auto scale of poll rate or
not.
For the console/TTY and modem
> Anyway I just want to know we still need auto scale of poll rate.
I correct the mistake in this sentence.
Anyway I just want to know whether we still need auto scale of poll rate or not.
Thanks
Chanho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
> Then it can use DMA polling post-wakeup?
Yes, It will be switched back to DMA polling on UART IRQ.
> What do you mean by "user" here? Userspace? Or
> "platform data parameter"?
platform data parameter
> Not platform I think. Per usecase.
> Are you not actually thinking about things like the
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Chanho Min wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Chanho Min wrote:
>>> [Russell]
Well, I thought I had explained that I'd prefer to see the poll rate
adjusted with the baud rate, but maybe I
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Chanho Min chanho@lge.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Chanho Min chanho@lge.com wrote:
[Russell]
Well, I thought I had explained that I'd prefer to see the poll
Then it can use DMA polling post-wakeup?
Yes, It will be switched back to DMA polling on UART IRQ.
What do you mean by user here? Userspace? Or
platform data parameter?
platform data parameter
Not platform I think. Per usecase.
Are you not actually thinking about things like the above?
Anyway I just want to know we still need auto scale of poll rate.
I correct the mistake in this sentence.
Anyway I just want to know whether we still need auto scale of poll rate or not.
Thanks
Chanho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Chanho Min wrote:
>> [Russell]
>>>Well, I thought I had explained that I'd prefer to see the poll rate
>>>adjusted with the baud rate, but maybe I wasn't explicit enough.
>>>Instead, what we seem to have
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Chanho Min wrote:
> [Russell]
>>Well, I thought I had explained that I'd prefer to see the poll rate
>>adjusted with the baud rate, but maybe I wasn't explicit enough.
>>Instead, what we seem to have ended up with are two new entries in
>>platform data (which
>Well, I thought I had explained that I'd prefer to see the poll rate
>adjusted with the baud rate, but maybe I wasn't explicit enough.
>Instead, what we seem to have ended up with are two new entries in
>platform data (which we're trying to get away from with DT):
>
>+ unsigned int
Well, I thought I had explained that I'd prefer to see the poll rate
adjusted with the baud rate, but maybe I wasn't explicit enough.
Instead, what we seem to have ended up with are two new entries in
platform data (which we're trying to get away from with DT):
+ unsigned int
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Chanho Min chanho@lge.com wrote:
[Russell]
Well, I thought I had explained that I'd prefer to see the poll rate
adjusted with the baud rate, but maybe I wasn't explicit enough.
Instead, what we seem to have ended up with are two new entries in
platform data
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Chanho Min chanho@lge.com wrote:
[Russell]
Well, I thought I had explained that I'd prefer to see the poll rate
adjusted with the baud rate, but maybe I wasn't explicit enough.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:25:07PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:07:57PM +0900, Chanho Min wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Linus Walleij
> > wrote:
> > >> - If poll timer is activated, We use consistent DMA mappings to avoid
> > >> from
> > >> the
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:07:57PM +0900, Chanho Min wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
> >> - If poll timer is activated, We use consistent DMA mappings to avoid from
> >> the frequent cache operation of the timer function. sg->coherency is used
> >> to check
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:07:57PM +0900, Chanho Min wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Linus Walleij
linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
- If poll timer is activated, We use consistent DMA mappings to avoid from
the frequent cache operation of the timer function. sg-coherency is used
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:25:07PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:07:57PM +0900, Chanho Min wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Linus Walleij
linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
- If poll timer is activated, We use consistent DMA mappings to avoid
from
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Linus Walleij
wrote:
>> - If poll timer is activated, We use consistent DMA mappings to avoid from
>> the frequent cache operation of the timer function. sg->coherency is used
>> to check if buffer is coherent.
>
> Hm. We can begin like this but maybe we
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Chanho Min wrote:
> In DMA support, The received data is not pushed to tty until the DMA buffer
> is filled. But some megabyte rate chips such as BT expect fast response and
> data should be pushed immediately. In order to fix this issue, We suggest
> the use of
In DMA support, The received data is not pushed to tty until the DMA buffer
is filled. But some megabyte rate chips such as BT expect fast response and
data should be pushed immediately. In order to fix this issue, We suggest
the use of the timer for polling DMA buffer.
In our test, no data loss
In DMA support, The received data is not pushed to tty until the DMA buffer
is filled. But some megabyte rate chips such as BT expect fast response and
data should be pushed immediately. In order to fix this issue, We suggest
the use of the timer for polling DMA buffer.
In our test, no data loss
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Chanho Min chanho@lge.com wrote:
In DMA support, The received data is not pushed to tty until the DMA buffer
is filled. But some megabyte rate chips such as BT expect fast response and
data should be pushed immediately. In order to fix this issue, We
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Linus Walleij
linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
- If poll timer is activated, We use consistent DMA mappings to avoid from
the frequent cache operation of the timer function. sg-coherency is used
to check if buffer is coherent.
Hm. We can begin like this
24 matches
Mail list logo
