On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:09:16PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Trying again; sending v4 as a reply to your email.
Did the v4 sending work for you?
/* Steinar */
--
Software Engineer, Google Switzerland
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:17:26AM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Then use Mutt to reply, but include the patch inline instead of
> attaching it. I believe this is discussed in the Mutt section of
> Documentation/email-clients.txt
Thanks; if that works (even though it changes the “From” line and such
"Steinar H. Gunderson" writes:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:15:50AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> Since I've now been bitten by this several times: Is there any sort of best
>>> practice for integrating git with MUAs? What I'm doing right now is
>>> cut-and-paste from mutt to get the to/cc/in-rep
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:15:50AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> Since I've now been bitten by this several times: Is there any sort of best
>> practice for integrating git with MUAs? What I'm doing right now is
>> cut-and-paste from mutt to get the to/cc/in-reply-to headers right, and
>> that's su
"Steinar H. Gunderson" writes:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 01:23:17PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> Attachments don't work, you know better than that :(
>
> Since I've now been bitten by this several times: Is there any sort of best
> practice for integrating git with MUAs? What I'm doing rig
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 01:23:17PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Attachments don't work, you know better than that :(
Since I've now been bitten by this several times: Is there any sort of best
practice for integrating git with MUAs? What I'm doing right now is
cut-and-paste from mutt to get
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:03:57AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 01:12:08PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Something is really wrong with your email client, it is saying this is
> > sent on Nov 26, the same exact time as your previous patch, yet you sent
> > thi
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:03:57AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I did git rebase --ignore-date HEAD^ just to reset the date. Sending it as an
> attachment just to be sure.
Hi Greg,
Did this work for you? Is there anything else I should do to this patch?
/* Steinar */
--
Software Enginee
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 01:12:08PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Something is really wrong with your email client, it is saying this is
> sent on Nov 26, the same exact time as your previous patch, yet you sent
> this in January. Which implies that this is an old patch and not an
> updated on
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 01:19:13AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Add a new interface for userspace to preallocate memory that can be
> used with usbfs. This gives two primary benefits:
Something is really wrong with your email client, it is saying this is
sent on Nov 26, the same exact time
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Add a new interface for userspace to preallocate memory that can be
> used with usbfs. This gives two primary benefits:
I got this when trying to allocate a little bit large buffer (~4MB)
using the new userspace libusb_dev_mem_alloc()
Add a new interface for userspace to preallocate memory that can be
used with usbfs. This gives two primary benefits:
- Zerocopy; data no longer needs to be copied between the userspace
and the kernel, but can instead be read directly by the driver from
userspace's buffers. This works for a
12 matches
Mail list logo
