On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:28 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:19:14AM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
>> I was testing the lz4(hc) patches, and I found the the compression
>> INCOMPAT flags are not being updated using the method in this patch.
>>
>> The compression INCOMPAT flags
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:28 PM, David Sterba d...@jikos.cz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:19:14AM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
I was testing the lz4(hc) patches, and I found the the compression
INCOMPAT flags are not being updated using the method in this patch.
The compression INCOMPAT
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:19:14AM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
> I was testing the lz4(hc) patches, and I found the the compression
> INCOMPAT flags are not being updated using the method in this patch.
>
> The compression INCOMPAT flags are generally checked and updated in
> the open_ctree()
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:19:14AM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
I was testing the lz4(hc) patches, and I found the the compression
INCOMPAT flags are not being updated using the method in this patch.
The compression INCOMPAT flags are generally checked and updated in
the open_ctree() function.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:40 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 08:48:37AM +0200, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
>> How show should we proceed to get above mentioned patch
>> (or the similar patch from Andrei Popa) merged?
>
> Josef picked the patch into btrfs-next, I see not problem to
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:40 AM, David Sterba d...@jikos.cz wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 08:48:37AM +0200, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
How show should we proceed to get above mentioned patch
(or the similar patch from Andrei Popa) merged?
Josef picked the patch into btrfs-next, I see not problem
6 matches
Mail list logo
