On Friday 12 of October 2012 20:31:38 Tang Chen wrote:
> "ACPI0004","PNP0A05" and "PNP0A06" are all defined in array
> container_device_ids[], so use it, but not the hard coding style.
>
> Also, introduce a new api is_container_device() to determine if a
> device is a container device.
>
> Signed
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
> "ACPI0004","PNP0A05" and "PNP0A06" are all defined in array
> container_device_ids[], so use it, but not the hard coding style.
>
> Also, introduce a new api is_container_device() to determine if a
> device is a container device.
>
> Signed-off-b
Hi,
Would somebody give some comments ?
Thanks. :)
On 10/12/2012 08:31 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
"ACPI0004","PNP0A05" and "PNP0A06" are all defined in array
container_device_ids[], so use it, but not the hard coding style.
Also, introduce a new api is_container_device() to determine if a
device is
Hi,
Would anyone help to review this patch, and give some comments, please ?
Thanks. :)
On 10/12/2012 08:31 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
"ACPI0004","PNP0A05" and "PNP0A06" are all defined in array
container_device_ids[], so use it, but not the hard coding style.
Also, introduce a new api is_container
"ACPI0004","PNP0A05" and "PNP0A06" are all defined in array
container_device_ids[], so use it, but not the hard coding style.
Also, introduce a new api is_container_device() to determine if a
device is a container device.
Signed-off-by: Tang Chen
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
---
drivers/ac
5 matches
Mail list logo