Hi Mathieu,
On 31.01.2018 08:47, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Since it's been a week, could you confirm the patch is ok as-is or do
you think some comment(s) from James should be incorporated ?
I'll prepare an updated patch that includes James' suggestions - I think
they will lead to an overall
Hi Marcin,
Since it's been a week, could you confirm the patch is ok as-is or do
you think some comment(s) from James should be incorporated ?
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:17 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:00:59PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> From: Marcin Nowakowski
>>
>
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:00:59PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> From: Marcin Nowakowski
>
> Change 73fbc1eba7ff added a fix to ensure that the memory range between
Please refer to commits with e.g. commit 73fbc1eba7ff ("MIPS: fix
mem=X@Y commandline processing").
> PHYS_OFFSET and low memo
Hi
On 21/12/17 21:00, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
From: Marcin Nowakowski
Change 73fbc1eba7ff added a fix to ensure that the memory range between
PHYS_OFFSET and low memory address specified by mem= cmdline argument is
not later processed by free_all_bootmem.
This change was incorrect for systems
From: Marcin Nowakowski
Change 73fbc1eba7ff added a fix to ensure that the memory range between
PHYS_OFFSET and low memory address specified by mem= cmdline argument is
not later processed by free_all_bootmem.
This change was incorrect for systems where the commandline specifies
more than 1 mem a
5 matches
Mail list logo