Hey Richard,
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 7:30 PM, richard -rw- weinberger
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>> The new option is CONFIG_CC_DISABLE_AUTO_INLINE and it's
>> located at:
>> * Kernel hacking
>> * Disable gcc automatic inlining
>
> Can you guarantee that
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 7:30 PM, richard -rw- weinberger
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>> The new option is CONFIG_CC_DISABLE_AUTO_INLINE and it's
>> located at:
>> * Kernel hacking
>> * Disable gcc automatic inlining
>
> Can you guarantee that this will sti
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Ezequiel Garcia writes:
>
>> The new option is CONFIG_CC_DISABLE_AUTO_INLINE and it's
>> located at:
>> * Kernel hacking
>> * Disable gcc automatic inlining
>
> You don't state anywhere why you want that?
>
This is important -if not neces
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> The new option is CONFIG_CC_DISABLE_AUTO_INLINE and it's
> located at:
> * Kernel hacking
> * Disable gcc automatic inlining
Can you guarantee that this will still produce a valid kernel?
AFAIK we have some functions which have to be
Ezequiel Garcia writes:
> The new option is CONFIG_CC_DISABLE_AUTO_INLINE and it's
> located at:
> * Kernel hacking
> * Disable gcc automatic inlining
You don't state anywhere why you want that?
-Andi
--
a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
The new option is CONFIG_CC_DISABLE_AUTO_INLINE and it's
located at:
* Kernel hacking
* Disable gcc automatic inlining
This option appends this options CFLAGS:
-fno-default-inline
-fno-inline
-fno-inline-small-functions
-fno-indirect-inlining
-fno-inline-functions-called-once
It's still no
6 matches
Mail list logo