Hi Marc,
On 08/30/2016 05:54 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 30/08/16 10:55, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:51:14PM -0500, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
We are doing an unnecessary stack push/pop operation when restoring
the guest registers x0-x18 in __guest_enter(). This patch
Hi Marc,
On 08/30/2016 05:54 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 30/08/16 10:55, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:51:14PM -0500, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
We are doing an unnecessary stack push/pop operation when restoring
the guest registers x0-x18 in __guest_enter(). This patch
On 30/08/16 10:55, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:51:14PM -0500, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
>> We are doing an unnecessary stack push/pop operation when restoring
>> the guest registers x0-x18 in __guest_enter(). This patch saves the
>> two instructions by using x18 as a base
On 30/08/16 10:55, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:51:14PM -0500, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
>> We are doing an unnecessary stack push/pop operation when restoring
>> the guest registers x0-x18 in __guest_enter(). This patch saves the
>> two instructions by using x18 as a base
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:51:14PM -0500, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
> We are doing an unnecessary stack push/pop operation when restoring
> the guest registers x0-x18 in __guest_enter(). This patch saves the
> two instructions by using x18 as a base register. No need to store
> the vcpu context
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:51:14PM -0500, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
> We are doing an unnecessary stack push/pop operation when restoring
> the guest registers x0-x18 in __guest_enter(). This patch saves the
> two instructions by using x18 as a base register. No need to store
> the vcpu context
We are doing an unnecessary stack push/pop operation when restoring
the guest registers x0-x18 in __guest_enter(). This patch saves the
two instructions by using x18 as a base register. No need to store
the vcpu context pointer in stack because it is redundant, the same
information is available in
We are doing an unnecessary stack push/pop operation when restoring
the guest registers x0-x18 in __guest_enter(). This patch saves the
two instructions by using x18 as a base register. No need to store
the vcpu context pointer in stack because it is redundant, the same
information is available in
8 matches
Mail list logo