On 2016/10/18 16:39, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2016/10/17 22:56, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> Commit 7ba5f605f3a0 ("arm64/numa: remove the limitation that cpu0 must
>> bind to node0") removed the numa cpu<->node mapping restriction whereby
>> logical cpu 0 always corresponds to numa node 0; removing
On 2016/10/18 16:39, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2016/10/17 22:56, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> Commit 7ba5f605f3a0 ("arm64/numa: remove the limitation that cpu0 must
>> bind to node0") removed the numa cpu<->node mapping restriction whereby
>> logical cpu 0 always corresponds to numa node 0; removing
On 2016/10/17 22:56, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
Commit 7ba5f605f3a0 ("arm64/numa: remove the limitation that cpu0 must
bind to node0") removed the numa cpu<->node mapping restriction whereby
logical cpu 0 always corresponds to numa node 0; removing the
restriction was correct, in that it does not
On 2016/10/17 22:56, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
Commit 7ba5f605f3a0 ("arm64/numa: remove the limitation that cpu0 must
bind to node0") removed the numa cpu<->node mapping restriction whereby
logical cpu 0 always corresponds to numa node 0; removing the
restriction was correct, in that it does not
Commit 7ba5f605f3a0 ("arm64/numa: remove the limitation that cpu0 must
bind to node0") removed the numa cpu<->node mapping restriction whereby
logical cpu 0 always corresponds to numa node 0; removing the
restriction was correct, in that it does not really exist in practice
but the commit only
Commit 7ba5f605f3a0 ("arm64/numa: remove the limitation that cpu0 must
bind to node0") removed the numa cpu<->node mapping restriction whereby
logical cpu 0 always corresponds to numa node 0; removing the
restriction was correct, in that it does not really exist in practice
but the commit only
6 matches
Mail list logo
