It's slightly cleaner to zero-out the delayed node upon allocation
than to do it by hand in btrfs_init_delayed_node() for a few members

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexande...@gmail.com>
---
v2: Thanks Jeff Mahoney for pointing out the mistake of removing
the atomic_set in v1 of the patch. atomic_set() call restored.

 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
index a2ae427..0a00c4f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
@@ -54,16 +54,11 @@ static inline void btrfs_init_delayed_node(
        delayed_node->root = root;
        delayed_node->inode_id = inode_id;
        atomic_set(&delayed_node->refs, 0);
-       delayed_node->count = 0;
-       delayed_node->flags = 0;
        delayed_node->ins_root = RB_ROOT;
        delayed_node->del_root = RB_ROOT;
        mutex_init(&delayed_node->mutex);
-       delayed_node->index_cnt = 0;
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&delayed_node->n_list);
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&delayed_node->p_list);
-       delayed_node->bytes_reserved = 0;
-       memset(&delayed_node->inode_item, 0, sizeof(delayed_node->inode_item));
 }
 
 static inline int btrfs_is_continuous_delayed_item(
@@ -132,7 +127,7 @@ again:
        if (node)
                return node;
 
-       node = kmem_cache_alloc(delayed_node_cache, GFP_NOFS);
+       node = kmem_cache_zalloc(delayed_node_cache, GFP_NOFS);
        if (!node)
                return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
        btrfs_init_delayed_node(node, root, ino);
-- 
2.6.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to