Re: [PATCH v2] clk: berlin: Migrate to clk_hw based registration and OF APIs

2016-08-18 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 08/18, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 17.08.2016 00:40, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we > >can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in > >these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of > >consumer and prov

Re: [PATCH v2] clk: berlin: Migrate to clk_hw based registration and OF APIs

2016-08-18 Thread Sebastian Hesselbarth
On 17.08.2016 00:40, Stephen Boyd wrote: Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of consumer and provider clk APIs. We also remove some __init markings

Re: [PATCH v2] clk: berlin: Migrate to clk_hw based registration and OF APIs

2016-08-18 Thread Jisheng Zhang
Hi Stephen, On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:40:52 -0700 Stephen Boyd wrote: > Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we > can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in > these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of > consumer and provider clk APIs. We

[PATCH v2] clk: berlin: Migrate to clk_hw based registration and OF APIs

2016-08-16 Thread Stephen Boyd
Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of consumer and provider clk APIs. We also remove some __init markings in header files as they're useless and we'r