From: Andreea-Cristina Bernat
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 13:12:09 +0300
> The "rcu_dereference()" calls are used directly in conditions.
> Since their return values are never dereferenced it is recommended to use
> "rcu_access_pointer()" instead of "rcu_dereference()".
> Therefore, this patch makes
From: Andreea-Cristina Bernat bernat@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 13:12:09 +0300
The rcu_dereference() calls are used directly in conditions.
Since their return values are never dereferenced it is recommended to use
rcu_access_pointer() instead of rcu_dereference().
Therefore, this
On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 13:12 +0300, Andreea-Cristina Bernat wrote:
> The "rcu_dereference()" calls are used directly in conditions.
> Since their return values are never dereferenced it is recommended to use
> "rcu_access_pointer()" instead of "rcu_dereference()".
> Therefore, this patch makes the
On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 13:12 +0300, Andreea-Cristina Bernat wrote:
The rcu_dereference() calls are used directly in conditions.
Since their return values are never dereferenced it is recommended to use
rcu_access_pointer() instead of rcu_dereference().
Therefore, this patch makes the
The "rcu_dereference()" calls are used directly in conditions.
Since their return values are never dereferenced it is recommended to use
"rcu_access_pointer()" instead of "rcu_dereference()".
Therefore, this patch makes the replacements.
The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used:
@@
@@
(
The rcu_dereference() calls are used directly in conditions.
Since their return values are never dereferenced it is recommended to use
rcu_access_pointer() instead of rcu_dereference().
Therefore, this patch makes the replacements.
The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used:
@@
@@
(
if(
6 matches
Mail list logo