On 7/30/2018 5:49 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Mukesh,
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
Hi All,
Can i get input on this ?
Sure.
Thanks,
Mukesh
On 7/24/2018 8:17 PM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
The input you get is that it's unprofessional to poke people after TWO days
about a patch which i
Mukesh,
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can i get input on this ?
Sure.
> Thanks,
> Mukesh
> On 7/24/2018 8:17 PM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
The input you get is that it's unprofessional to poke people after TWO days
about a patch which is purely cosmetic.
It's perfectly fine
Hi All,
Can i get input on this ?
Thanks,
Mukesh
On 7/24/2018 8:17 PM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
After commit 249d4a9b3246 ("timers: Reinitialize per cpu bases
on hotplug") i.e introduction of state CPUHP_TIMERS_PREPARE
instead of CPUHP_TIMERS_DEAD the cpuhp_step name "timers:dead"
for timer looks to
After commit 249d4a9b3246 ("timers: Reinitialize per cpu bases
on hotplug") i.e introduction of state CPUHP_TIMERS_PREPARE
instead of CPUHP_TIMERS_DEAD the cpuhp_step name "timers:dead"
for timer looks to be invalid. So, better to name it as
"timers:prepare".
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha
Cc: Thomas
4 matches
Mail list logo