Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Don't use smp_processor_id() in preemptible context

2013-08-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 09:50:22 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 29 August 2013 02:54, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Workqueues are preemptible even if works are queued on them with > > queue_work_on(). Let's use raw_smp_processor_id() here to silence > > the warning. > > > > BUG: using smp_processor_i

Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Don't use smp_processor_id() in preemptible context

2013-08-28 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 29 August 2013 02:54, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Workqueues are preemptible even if works are queued on them with > queue_work_on(). Let's use raw_smp_processor_id() here to silence > the warning. > > BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code: kworker/3:2/674 > caller is gov_queue

[PATCH v2] cpufreq: Don't use smp_processor_id() in preemptible context

2013-08-28 Thread Stephen Boyd
Workqueues are preemptible even if works are queued on them with queue_work_on(). Let's use raw_smp_processor_id() here to silence the warning. BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code: kworker/3:2/674 caller is gov_queue_work+0x28/0xb0 CPU: 0 PID: 674 Comm: kworker/3:2 Tainted