Re: [PATCH v2] drm/panel: simple: Add support for Innolux AT070TN92

2016-04-22 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:11:19PM +0200, Holger Schurig wrote: > Thierry Reding writes: > > Applied, thanks. > > I once read that this is the recommended way to go, instead of > specifying the timings in the device tree. Why is this so? Any new > display just increases the .text size of the ker

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/panel: simple: Add support for Innolux AT070TN92

2016-04-21 Thread Holger Schurig
Thierry Reding writes: > Applied, thanks. I once read that this is the recommended way to go, instead of specifying the timings in the device tree. Why is this so? Any new display just increases the .text size of the kernel unnessary. Did this idea stem from the era where bootloaders like Bareb

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/panel: simple: Add support for Innolux AT070TN92

2016-04-20 Thread Thierry Reding
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 03:37:15PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > From: Riccardo Bortolato > > Add support for the Innolux AT070TN92 panel. > > Signed-off-by: Riccardo Bortolato > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > > --- > Changes since v1: > - Add missing SoB > --- > .../bindings/display/pan

[PATCH v2] drm/panel: simple: Add support for Innolux AT070TN92

2016-04-20 Thread Boris Brezillon
From: Riccardo Bortolato Add support for the Innolux AT070TN92 panel. Signed-off-by: Riccardo Bortolato Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon --- Changes since v1: - Add missing SoB --- .../bindings/display/panel/innolux,at070tn92.txt | 7 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c