Hi Geert,
Le 20/11/2017 à 09:49, Geert Uytterhoeven a écrit :
> Hi Cyrille,
>
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Cyrille Pitchen
> wrote:
>> sorry but I won't apply this patch.
>>
>> New values for the 'compatible' DT properties should only be added for
>> memory
Hi Geert,
Le 20/11/2017 à 09:49, Geert Uytterhoeven a écrit :
> Hi Cyrille,
>
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Cyrille Pitchen
> wrote:
>> sorry but I won't apply this patch.
>>
>> New values for the 'compatible' DT properties should only be added for
>> memory parts not supporting the JEDEC
Hi Fabrizio,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Fabrizio Castro
wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Cyrille Pitchen
>> wrote:
>> BTW, "sst" (for Silicon Storage Technology) should be added to
>>
Hi Fabrizio,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Fabrizio Castro
wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Cyrille Pitchen
>> wrote:
>> BTW, "sst" (for Silicon Storage Technology) should be added to
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt, too, to avoid another
>> warning:
>>
>>
Dear All,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add sst25vf016b to the list of
> supported chip names
>
> Hi Cyrille,
>
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Cyrille Pitchen
> <cyrille.pitc...@wedev4u.fr> wrote:
> > sorry but I won't apply this patch.
>
Dear All,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add sst25vf016b to the list of
> supported chip names
>
> Hi Cyrille,
>
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Cyrille Pitchen
> wrote:
> > sorry but I won't apply this patch.
> >
> > New values for the
Hi Cyrille,
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Cyrille Pitchen
wrote:
> sorry but I won't apply this patch.
>
> New values for the 'compatible' DT properties should only be added for
> memory parts not supporting the JEDEC READ ID (0x9F) command.
I tent to disagree.
Hi Cyrille,
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Cyrille Pitchen
wrote:
> sorry but I won't apply this patch.
>
> New values for the 'compatible' DT properties should only be added for
> memory parts not supporting the JEDEC READ ID (0x9F) command.
I tent to disagree. Documenting part numbers in
On 11/17/2017 06:36 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> Hi Fabrizio,
>
> sorry but I won't apply this patch.
ACK on that, if it can be detected with READID or SFDP, use that and
don't add redundant stuff into the DT bindings.
btw which renesas board has this SPI NOR on it ?
> New values for the
On 11/17/2017 06:36 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> Hi Fabrizio,
>
> sorry but I won't apply this patch.
ACK on that, if it can be detected with READID or SFDP, use that and
don't add redundant stuff into the DT bindings.
btw which renesas board has this SPI NOR on it ?
> New values for the
Hello Cyrille,
it's ok, thank you for the feedback.
Best regards,
Fab
> Hi Fabrizio,
>
> sorry but I won't apply this patch.
>
> New values for the 'compatible' DT properties should only be added for
> memory parts not supporting the JEDEC READ ID (0x9F) command.
>
> SST25 memories do support
Hello Cyrille,
it's ok, thank you for the feedback.
Best regards,
Fab
> Hi Fabrizio,
>
> sorry but I won't apply this patch.
>
> New values for the 'compatible' DT properties should only be added for
> memory parts not supporting the JEDEC READ ID (0x9F) command.
>
> SST25 memories do support
Hi Fabrizio,
sorry but I won't apply this patch.
New values for the 'compatible' DT properties should only be added for
memory parts not supporting the JEDEC READ ID (0x9F) command.
SST25 memories do support this command hence should use the "jedec,spi-nor"
value alone. For historical reasons,
Hi Fabrizio,
sorry but I won't apply this patch.
New values for the 'compatible' DT properties should only be added for
memory parts not supporting the JEDEC READ ID (0x9F) command.
SST25 memories do support this command hence should use the "jedec,spi-nor"
value alone. For historical reasons,
Dear All,
how does this patch look like?
Thanks,
Fabrizio
> Subject: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add sst25vf016b to the list of
> supported chip names
>
> There are a few DT files that make use of sst25vf016b in their
> compatible strings, and the driver supports th
Dear All,
how does this patch look like?
Thanks,
Fabrizio
> Subject: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add sst25vf016b to the list of
> supported chip names
>
> There are a few DT files that make use of sst25vf016b in their
> compatible strings, and the driver supports th
There are a few DT files that make use of sst25vf016b in their
compatible strings, and the driver supports this chip already.
This patch improves the documentation and therefore the result
of ./scripts/checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro
Signed-off-by:
There are a few DT files that make use of sst25vf016b in their
compatible strings, and the driver supports this chip already.
This patch improves the documentation and therefore the result
of ./scripts/checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro
Signed-off-by: Chris Paterson
Acked-by: Rob
18 matches
Mail list logo