> Ok, the code is not very clear, but now I can see it. p_block is
> actually misused here to store the number of indexes in the current
> node while diving into the tree. Then on the way up, we are checking
> that to see if the eh_entries changed or not (which is indicating
> that something has
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Ashish Sangwan wrote:
> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 15:22:04 +0530
> From: Ashish Sangwan
> To: Lukáš Czerner
> Cc: sand...@redhat.com, Ted Tso , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> linux-e...@vger.kernel.org, Namjae Jeon
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: fix
...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: fix hole punch failure when depth is greater
than 0
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Lukáš Czerner lczer...@redhat.com wrote:
So I've finally has some time to look at the patch and reproduce the
problem. Thanks for noticing the problem
Ok, the code is not very clear, but now I can see it. p_block is
actually misused here to store the number of indexes in the current
node while diving into the tree. Then on the way up, we are checking
that to see if the eh_entries changed or not (which is indicating
that something has been
4 matches
Mail list logo
